The Illusion of the Big Reset

Every year begins with the same strange illusion.

The calendar changes, and suddenly time feels pliable. People feel as if the past twelve months are sealed off, finished, no longer relevant. The future opens up like a blank notebook. Anything seems possible again.

This sensation is powerful… but also misleading.

A new year does not reset your habits, your temperament, your obligations, or your weaknesses. It simply gives you a moment of psychological distance from them. And that distance can be useful… but only if it’s used correctly.

Most people waste it.

They rush to set goals before they understand their constraints. They confuse intention with execution. They treat planning as an emotional exercise instead of a structural one. And when the year collapses into the same patterns by March, they blame themselves rather than the design.

This essay is about how to plan a year in a way that actually survives contact with reality…

---

Thank you for being part of our mission! If you’d like to support us, and join in the book club sessions directly, please consider a paid subscription. You’ll get:

• All live book discussions and recordings (biweekly)

• Regular essays to guide you through the books we’re reading

• The full archive of articles, essays, and podcasts

• Access to our community of readers

Our first discussion on The Everlasting Man by G. K. Chesterton takes place on January 6 at 12pm ET — join us!

Note: all paid members can join the live discussions up on stage. You’ll receive Zoom links shortly before each session.

---

The First Mistake: Planning From the Future Backward

Most annual plans begin with fantasy.

People imagine the ideal version of themselves at the end of the year… healthier, wealthier, calmer, more accomplished… and then work backward, listing everything that version of themselves must have done.

This feels logical. It is not.

The future version of you has different capacities than the present one. More momentum. More proof. More skill. Planning backward assumes those capacities already exist.

They don’t.

Good planning starts from the present forward. From your current energy, attention span, responsibilities, and limitations. Not the ones you wish you had.

The purpose of a plan is not to express who you want to be. It is to create conditions under which change becomes likely.

That requires honesty first, ambition second.

A Year Is Not a Goal Container

One of the most common planning errors is treating the year as a container for goals.

People ask: What do I want to accomplish this year?
That question already sets them up to fail.

A year is not a box you fill with achievements. It is a stretch of time during which certain behaviors are repeated, others are avoided, and some are reinforced.

Outcomes are downstream.

If you focus on outcomes first, you end up with plans that look impressive but lack mechanisms. If you focus on behaviors, outcomes often take care of themselves.

This is why the work of Benjamin Franklin still feels modern. He did not ask what kind of man he wanted to be by December. He asked what actions he needed to notice, track, and correct daily.

He treated improvement as a system, not a seasonal resolution.

Start by Defining the Year’s Center of Gravity

A serious year has a center of gravity.

One thing that everything else orbits around.

Most people resist this idea because it feels restrictive. They want the year to be expansive, full of progress in every domain. But attention does not work that way. Energy does not work that way. Time certainly does not work that way.

A year without a center collapses into fragmentation.

The right question is not what do I want to improve?
It is what deserves sustained focus for the next twelve months?

This might be:

• A business or creative project

• A body of work

• A skill that compounds slowly

• A phase of consolidation or repair

If you cannot name one primary focus, the year will choose one for you… usually the most reactive or urgent thing in your life.

Choosing a center of gravity is an act of commitment. It also makes everything else easier to evaluate. If something does not support the center, it becomes optional. Or disposable.

Why Fewer Projects Win

People consistently overestimate how many meaningful projects they can carry at once.

This is not a moral failing. It is a cognitive one.

Each serious project taxes not just time, but attention, memory, and emotional bandwidth. Switching contexts has a cost. Managing multiple long-term efforts multiplies friction.

A well-planned year usually has:

• One defining project

• One secondary responsibility that maintains or stabilizes life

• Everything else intentionally deprioritized

This does not mean ignoring health, relationships, or finances. It means not trying to optimize everything simultaneously.

Optimization everywhere leads to mediocrity everywhere.

Progress comes from depth, not spread.

The Week Is the Real Planning Unit

Annual plans fail because they live at the wrong level of abstraction.

The year feels meaningful, but it is too large to act on. The day feels actionable, but too small to orient strategy. The week sits in the middle.

If something cannot be expressed as a weekly rhythm, it is not real.

This is the simplest test of a plan:
What does this look like in an average week?

Not an ideal week. Not a vacation week. A normal one.

How many hours?
Which days?
Which trade-offs?

Vague answers are warning signs.

If your plan cannot survive a boring Tuesday, it will not survive February.

Plan for Energy Before Time

Most people plan their year as if all hours are interchangeable.

They are not..